PAIRING · RECONCILE AND SYNC / NETWORK DISCOVERY
Axonius or runZero: which keeps your CMDB record more accurate?
SHORT ANSWER
By The Record Desk · CMDB Alternatives Compare · Published 2026-10-11
How do they compare criterion by criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Axonius | runZero | Higher |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completeness of discovery | 20% | 92 | 72 | Axonius |
ReasonsAxonius: More than 1,200 adapters, and the platform page lists devices, identities, SaaS, software, cloud, IoT and OT as covered asset types. Source: Axonius platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: Active scanning, passive discovery and integrations across IT, OT, IoT, cloud, mobile and remote assets; SaaS apps are not covered. Source: runZero platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Data trust and reconciliation | 20% | 90 | 70 | Axonius |
ReasonsAxonius: Correlating each connected tool's data into one record per asset is the core of the product, and the Reconciliation Workspace flags mismatched field values. Source: Axonius blog: Asset Cloud enhanced with AI-ready data foundation · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: Profiles each asset against nearly 1,000 attributes and merges integration data into that profile. Source: runZero homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Ownership mapping | 12% | 72 | 58 | Axonius |
ReasonsAxonius: Discovers human and non-human identities and flags orphaned accounts; an explicit asset-owner field is not described on the pages reviewed. Source: Axonius: identities · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: Entra ID and Active Directory data enriches device records; ownership is not a documented field. Source: runZero integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Keeping the CMDB in sync | 16% | 92 | 66 | Axonius |
ReasonsAxonius: Fetches ServiceNow CMDB tables and documents create, update and disable or remove actions for ServiceNow assets; missing CMDB records are flagged. Source: Axonius docs: ServiceNow adapter · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: The ServiceNow integration enriches the CMDB; creating or retiring CMDB records is not described. Source: runZero integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Effort to maintain | 14% | 68 | 86 | runZero |
ReasonsAxonius: Continuous discovery cycles refresh the record without manual entry, but every adapter needs API access and credentials to keep working. Source: Axonius platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: No agents, authentication or appliances required; recurring scans plus always-on passive discovery. Source: runZero platform · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Actionability | 10% | 82 | 48 | Axonius |
ReasonsAxonius: Enforcement actions run single steps or multi-step sequences with ticket tracking; the ticket work itself runs in the ITSM tool. Source: Axonius documentation · Read 27 Sep 2026 runZero: No workflow of its own is documented; findings move through integrations. Source: runZero integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
| Pricing clarity | 8% | 72 | 82 | runZero |
ReasonsAxonius: The pricing page states device-based pricing on unique, correlated devices and shows a starting figure of $8.55 per asset for 15,000-24,999 assets; AWS Marketplace lists 500 assets at $90,625 for 12 months. Other tiers are not shown. Source: Axonius pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026 runZero: Community Edition free for 100 or fewer assets, Platform from $5,000, and a free 21-day trial. Source: runZero pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026 | ||||
What do their record cards show?
Axonius
runZero
- Axonius documents SYNCED more fully than runZero (documented against partial).
How do they differ on price and deployment?
| Axonius | runZero | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Device-based: the meter is the number of unique, correlated, deduplicated devices, with tiers from under 500 to 10M+ devices and volume discounts. The pricing page shows a starting figure of $8.55 per asset for 15,000-24,999 assets; other tier figures are not shown. AWS Marketplace price: 500 assets for $90,625 on a 12-month contract, with private offers available. Source: Axonius pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026 | Community Edition free for 100 or fewer assets (30-day retention). runZero Platform starts at $5,000. Free, full-featured 21-day trial. Source: runZero pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026 |
| Deployment | Hosted SaaS, or self-managed on-premises or in your own cloud. The docs describe Axonius-hosted SaaS on a dedicated AWS EC2 instance in any EC2 region, or a customer-hosted virtual appliance on the internal network. | "Flexible SaaS and on-prem options, and even support for air-gapped environments"; "no agents, authentication, or appliances". |
| Type | Reconcile and sync | Network discovery |
| Best for | Teams that want one reconciled record from the tools they already run, kept in sync with ServiceNow | Networks with OT and unmanaged devices, including air-gapped sites |
Which should you choose?
Choose Axonius if
- Completeness of discovery matters most to you (it scores 92)
- Keeping the CMDB in sync matters most to you (it scores 92)
- Teams that want one reconciled record from the tools they already run, kept in sync with ServiceNow
Choose runZero if
- Effort to maintain matters most to you (it scores 86)
- Pricing clarity matters most to you (it scores 82)
- Networks with OT and unmanaged devices, including air-gapped sites
Where next?
Frequently asked questions
Which scores higher overall, Axonius or runZero?
On our default weights Axonius scores 83.2 against 69.3 for runZero. Axonius scores higher on completeness of discovery, data trust and reconciliation, ownership mapping, keeping the CMDB in sync and actionability; runZero scores higher on effort to maintain and pricing clarity.
Which publishes a price?
Axonius: Device-based: the meter is the number of unique, correlated, deduplicated devices, with tiers from under 500 to 10M+ devices and volume discounts. The pricing page shows a starting figure of $8.55 per asset for 15,000-24,999 assets; other tier figures are not shown. AWS Marketplace price: 500 assets for $90,625 on a 12-month contract, with private offers available. runZero: Community Edition free for 100 or fewer assets (30-day retention). runZero Platform starts at $5,000. Free, full-featured 21-day trial.
Which needs less upkeep?
runZero scores 86 on effort to maintain against 68 for Axonius: No agents, authentication or appliances required; recurring scans plus always-on passive discovery.